that cant be healthy :) --mat
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 21:04, Dennis B. Rowe wrote: > Ooooh beat you, 62.13018% > Muhahaha > > Dennis > > On 20:20 Mon 06 Oct , Shannon Roddy wrote: > > So how do you rank? -> http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html > > > > I ranked at 37.47535% - Major Geek. not sure if that is good, bad, or > > neither. :-) > > > > > > Shannon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://oxygen.nocdirect.com/pipermail/general_brlug.net/attachments/20031006/40f1c6c5/attachment.bin From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 6 21:18:47 2003 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jeremy J Bertrand) Date: Mon Oct 6 21:18:37 2003 Subject: [brlug-general] geekiness test.... In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 37.08087% - Major Geek damn i didn't think i was that bad -- is the lower the number better or not ?? Jeremy Bertrand email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------- Original Message ----------- From: Mat Branyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [email protected] Sent: Mon, 06 Oct 2003 20:45:46 -0500 Subject: Re: [brlug-general] geekiness test.... > 36.68639% - Major Geek > > dammit.. you beat me... i think > > --mat > > On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 20:20, Shannon Roddy wrote: > > So how do you rank? -> http://www.innergeek.us/geek.html > > > > I ranked at 37.47535% - Major Geek. not sure if that is good, bad, or > > neither. :-) > > > > > > Shannon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > ------- End of Original Message -------
