I think I am going to go with ext3 just for time sake. Looks like reiser would have given me about 50-100 gigs more space, but it is not too much of an issue.
it is more important that I get this thing up and running than it be perfectly optimized. Shannon Tim Fournet wrote: >Found this article, looks pretty well organized. The impression I get is >that in some cases, Reiser can be much faster, but ext3 is a safer bet. >http://www.gurulabs.com/ext3-reiserfs.html > >On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 20:10, Shannon Roddy wrote: > > >>Hello all, >> >>I have two 1.5 terabyte file systems that I am getting ready to serve >>out via NFS (two 8 port 3ware SATA raid cards). I have a question >>though: Is there any advantage to formatting this with say reiser over >>ext3, etc? XFS? Any opinions? Hard benchmark numbers? >> >>Thanks, >>Shannon >> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>General mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >> >> > > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > >
