Actually I meant just for storing the images, as lots of different versions tend to fill up local drives.
You could make it much slower with a bit of effort, such as using floppy disks with spanned VMware images, or maybe dumping the images to hard copy and using OCR to read them. Or you could find a trillion or so volunteers to each memorize a byte of the VMWare image and you could call them up for the values as you need them. --- Dustin Puryear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't VMware be pretty slow if accessing its disk > images over the > network? I use VMware daily, and I dread to think > what it would run like > over the network. Maybe you could test that out and > let us know? Well, good > luck and break a leg! Oh wait.. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Hebert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:09 PM > Subject: VMware was Re: Re: [brlug-general] Flowscan > finally > working......andwell! > > > > As it happens, I've used VMware alot at work on > both > > Windows and Linux boxen for development and > testing. > > It saves a _lot_ of time when trying out new > stuff. > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net ===== John Hebert Official BRLUG Linux Curmudgeon Open Source Ankle Biter __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what youre looking for faster http://search.yahoo.com
