--- "Baudouin, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I would respectfully point out to John that
> FeatherLinux looks almost
> exactly like DSL in that they are both based on
> Knoppix on top of the xfbdev
> server using the Dillo web browser. I could not
> tell from the screenshots
> what WM it uses, but it didn't look any more
> advanced than fluxbox. How is
> this any different from DSL? How is it any more
> user-friendly?
Obviously, the rounded icons. :)
I really didn't mean to annoy you Andrew. Maybe it's
just been a while since I've played with DSL, but I
remember that it seemed to be harder to install than
Feather. However, you are correct, they are both very
similar; Knoppix, fluxbox, etc. I just thought that
DSL was aimed at machines with little RAM, but I could
be confusing that with TinyLinux. :P
We are splitting hairs here, I think. Either would be
fine for the CACRC's needs, provided the install is
easy.
I imagine the best thing to do would be for each of us
to provide a CD of our preferred distro to David and
he can try out each to evaluate what he needs. Heck,
he could end up offering both!
John
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Meet the all-new My Yahoo! - Try it today!
http://my.yahoo.com
