I might be confused, but what "architectural limitations" caused Microsoft to write buggy/bad code?
- Dennis On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 20:59:29 -0600, Andrew Baudouin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm starting to wonder if maybe the architectural limitations of x86 > aren't partially to blame for the insecurity of Windows.... > > > On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 21:14:01 -0600 (CST), Brad Bendily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > if they'd just port it to x86. > > > > Amen brother! > > > > > The market is practically begging for a > > > secure, reliable, "standardized" OS to get away from Windows. If OSX ran > > > on x86, i think it would be real competition for Linux, especially for > > > people/companies moving to Linux to get away from Windows. > > > > We can all hope and pray for this to happen. I dunno they released > > a headless mac. That's a move in the right direction. Maybe the > > next step will be release OSX for x86! I think you're right, > > I think a lot of people would be very interested in running > > a smooth looking solid running OS that already has lots of vendor > > support. > > > > Wait, i'm already doing that! Well, OSX would be cool too! > > > > > > BB > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net >
