Yeah, the EMC purchase of VMware was like three or four years ago, no?
Will S., are you on here still? He would know. Anyway, no, I remember a
little more clearly that it was Citrix that bought one of the middle
security players. I'd google it, but that wouldn't be any fun. ;)

Wait, was it Citrix? Or did they buy Altiris? Or is that wrong too? Oh
lord, forget it. I'm getting old..

--
Puryear Information Technology, LLC
Baton Rouge, LA * 225-706-8414
http://www.puryear-it.com

Author, "Best Practices for Managing Linux and UNIX Servers"
  http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices

Identity Management, LDAP, and Linux Integration


Fernando Vilas wrote:
> On Sunday 23 September 2007 20:09:34 Dustin Puryear wrote:
>> Well, it's not NEW news per se. VM software has never been risk-free--no
>> software is. And as far as "between" VMs, well, there is a big VMware
>> market for software that acts as a sentry between VMs to watch for
>> problems and attacks. Funny, eh?
>>
> Sounds like a virtual router/firewall/IDS to me.  Useful, but it also smacks 
> of the market created by MS for security software in the 1990s.
> 
>> Didn't EMC or someone just buy one of those smaller VM security vendors
>> up? I think so.
>>
> 
> Xen was either created at or bought by Novell, and Sun has a partnership with 
> them relating to OpenSolaris playing nice with Xen.  KVM is open source and 
> mostly came from the qEMU project before being merged into the mainline linux 
> kernel.  I think the VM vendor that EMC bought was VMWare, unless you were 
> referring to one of the watchdog type software suites.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at brlug.net
> http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net

Reply via email to