I think we can officially change definition of bandwidth since it means data consumption rather than throughput. -- Karthik Poobalasubramanian Louisiana Board of Regents [email protected] [email protected] (225) 341-5855 skype: poobal
On Mar 3, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Tim Fournet wrote: > I thought all users had the same amount of bandwidth, depending on network > conditions and environment? > > Or do you mean high throughput users? > > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 2:07 PM, Dustin Puryear <[email protected]> > wrote: > I know I'll catch a lot of flack for this, but, honestly, I'm not against > tiered pricing from service providers like AT&T for high-bandwidth users: > > > http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/03/02/att_says_tiered_data_pricing_inevitable_not_rushing_towards_4g.html > > Why should users that use little bandwidth subsidize high-bandwidth users? > > > --- > Puryear IT, LLC - Baton Rouge, LA - http://www.puryear-it.com/ > Active Directory Integration : Web & Enterprise Single Sign-On > Identity and Access Management : Linux/UNIX technologies > > Download our free ebook "Best Practices for Linux and UNIX Servers" > http://www.puryear-it.com/pubs/linux-unix-best-practices/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://mail.brlug.net/mailman/listinfo/general_brlug.net
