On Sat, Oct 19, 2002 at 11:10:54PM -0400, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: > Greg Stein wrote: > > > > When I requested the infrastructure set-up, I asked for general@ because > > that seemed to be the pattern in use in Jakarta/XML and their commons > > (sub)projects. We should use either dev@ or general@; I don't have a > > preference. > > disagree. 'dev' is for development discussions (think [EMAIL PROTECTED]); > 'general' > is for general discussions, including/especially users (think [EMAIL > PROTECTED]).
Isn't the real issue here whether the Top-level Commons contributors will be dealing with developmental issues (as in code) or just general organizational issues (as in which projects to accept, and under what circumstances)? I tend to like modeling it after the previously successful Jakarta Commons project. -aaron
