On Mon, 21 Oct 2002 18:53, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> I agree that what you say is the most sensible and correct way...

but ... 

> The reality is that this *will* create tensions and flamewars.
> Defining a different namespace will just make things easier, by avoiding
> stupid discussions like the one that is happening now, because there
> *are* people that just want to break balls as we say.

Never! Of course not. This has never happened before ! 

:)

> IMHO using
>
>    org.apache.common.*
>
> is a possible solution.

icky IMHO.

I still prefer just going with 

apache.commons.*

It makes more semantic sense to me and still avoids all namespace conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,

Peter Donald
He strains to hear a whisper who refuses to hear a shout.

Reply via email to