---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: Re: Reply-To munging considered harmful Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 06:36:03 -0400 From: Rodent of Unusual Size <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "B. W. Fitzpatrick" wrote: > In your opinion. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the first list I have *ever* been > on that munges the reply-to. I've had to get used to it even though I > don't particularly care for. considerably more than half the apache lists use it. and that's several dozen. > > Having a debate on this is STUPID. There are no merits less two: > > I *totally* agree that this is stupid. I thought that we took a vote > on this two weeks ago and the matter was closed, but I guess the vote > will be left open until we munge the sodding reply-to. we had a vote amongst the pmc, and the pmc list won't have reply-to set (much as i personally dislike that answer). the users get to have their opinions counted. > This is the worst example of bikeshed painting I've seen in a long > time. To hell with deciding what commons is actually for, let's debate > mailing list prefs. there is no debate, only voting. -- #ken P-)} Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Golux.Com/coar/ Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/ "Millennium hand and shrimp!" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- -- Cheers, Peter Donald He strains to hear a whisper who refuses to hear a shout.
