On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 04:56:55PM -0700, Greg Stein wrote: > On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 12:49:08AM +0200, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: > >... > > In truth, I made a mistake in vetoing, since I never wanted to stop > > Peter, it was just a strong opinion but I wrongly threw in a -1... (ya > > know, it happens that we use it in discussing, just for opinions, but > > when you follow 28 lists it sometimes happens to make a mistake). > > In the past, I've advocated that people avoid using -1 to mean "strong > against, but not a veto." It is just too confusing. People always end up > having to append "yah that's a veto" or "not a veto". Why the hell use the > short numeric voting form if you just have to explain it in prose? > > To that end, I adovcate using something like "-0.9" to mean you're against > it, but it isn't an official veto. Use -1 when you're actually vetoing. >
+0.9 :) OK, seriously, +1. -- Scott Sanders - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
