From: "B. W. Fitzpatrick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I dunno, but I really would prefer that we just take things and > > evolve as we go. I'm getting awfully tired of dealing with > > (proposed) bureaucracy. I'm so far removed from code right now, I > > want to cry. I really do favor the 'just enough structure to keep us > > from falling apart' in such new endeavors. > > I couldn't have said it any better.
IMO, the discussion about what mailing lists to create etc. is based on an assumption that j-c will move into a-c. Thus, since j-c committers already know the good and bad parts of one mailing list/shared karma etc. we are discussing whether what we currently have in j-c is optimal. If a-c was starting empty, I might agree with the bureaucracy comment, but I think that if it can't attract j-c it really isn't succeeding. Stephen
