On Wednesday, January 15, 2003, at 04:05 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 03:12:30PM -0800, Aaron Bannert wrote:Oh really?
I thought this was going to be an optional project-by-project decision, not a fiat.
I asked, and nobody had any objections at the time. I don't think it is a
big deal to use two repositories, but I'd prefer not to.
As long as nobody is turned away because [they think] they have to use SVN.
A good way to keep this project from growing (note: current size == 0) is to limit the tools.
Now that is just FUD and you know it :-) The size is zero because of
inactivity, not because of the tools. Until Justin installed SVN, people
were perfectly capable of putting their projects into CVS. If they were
waiting for SVN to get installed before coming to Apache Commons (such as
serf), then I think the answer is that the size is zero *because* of the
tools availability :-)
Eating one's own dogfood is a good thing, but you SVN guys need to get a little
dietary variety every once in awhile. ;)
I know that the size will go from 0 to 1 (serf) because SVN is available. I
got the impression that Scott Sanders wanted to add some stuff, and wanted
to use SVN for that.
Cool. +1 for that.
-aaron
