Jason,
Thanks.
But, um, what if I need to? :-)
Is there a work-around for such a case, that is to cts:search() on a
constructed node sequence?
I've tried passing doc($x) -- from my original example -- to the
first parameter of the construct but got "invalid URI format." All
other varieties result in the "unsearchable" error.
I'm working off Mr. Ryan Grimm's conceptual Google-ish model
http://developer.marklogic.com/svn/commons/trunk/search/query-xml/
example-search.xqy
in which the query body returns in one case cts:search(doc
($documents), $ctsQuery)[1 to 10]; however, that also throws the
"invalid URI format" error for said reason.... Looking for a way
around.
Regards,
Shannon
On Sep 14, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Jason Hunter wrote:
Shannon Shiflett wrote:
Hi,
Can cts:search() operate on a sequence of constructed nodes?
Unknown whether "fully searchable XPath" precludes. E.g.,
let $x := collection("PGWDE")//tei:div1[cts:contains(.//tei:note,
cts:word-query("foo"))]
return cts:search($x, cts:word-query("bar"))
Thanks,
Shannon
UVA Press
Not at this point, no. The first argument to cts:search() must
start with doc(), collection(), input(), or slash (implying input
()). It also has other restrictions, like it can't have positional
predicates or use reverse axes. If you do, you'll get the
"unsearchable expression" error.
-jh-
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
