Ok, that seems straight forward enough. Do you folks generally recommend one scheme over another? When I was first looking at the system I thought it was interesting that I could load a document under a path like
http://hostname.domain.org/fu/bar or file:/fu/bar Is using one form or the other likely to cause trouble? > fn:base-uri() just returns you the most immediate encoding value of > xml:base, or if there is none, the URI under which the document is stored. > There is no requirement that it be an absolute URI or that it somehow be > resolved to one if it isn't. It is intended to be something you can > use with resolve-uri, and it is certainly a bad idea to attempt to > use it a relative base to resolve other relative URIs; and the specs say > this is an error. (The algorithms in the RFC don't work in this case.) > > MarkLogic Server preserves the invariant fn:base-uri( doc($x) ) = $x > so that if you have "/a.xml" or "a.xml" the URI doesn't get munged to > something else. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - James A. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Stanford University HighWire Press http://highwire.stanford.edu/ +1 650 7237294 (Work) +1 650 7259335 (Fax) _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
