Great suggestion ! I hadn't thought of that. Passing an external parameter with the body of the doc to document-insert ....
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Blakeley Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 2:21 PM To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General]session.insertContent vsxdmp:document-insert That would be true for xdmp:document-load(), but xdmp:document-insert() does not rely on the filesystem. An XCC program could pass XML as an external variable of type xs:string to an XQuery module, which would unquote it, then doc-insert the result. For an example of this technique, see http://developer.marklogic.com/svn/recordloader/trunk/README.html (under "CONTENT_FACTORY_CLASSNAME"). But as Danny points out, XCC's built-in Content class is likely to be more efficient for most applications. One exception relates to Robert's other recent question: "Saving a document with properties". It's fairly simple to use xdmp:document-insert() and xdmp:document-add-properties() in a single transaction, while XCC's ContentCreateOptions API does not support document properties. -- Mike On 2009-05-20 10:38, Lee, David wrote: > The other issue is “where is the source content”. > If the ML server is on a machine which does not have local file access to the > source content, then the ONLY way to get it there is with > session.insertContent() > which reads from the client machine. > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Danny Sokolsky > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 1:37 PM > To: General Mark Logic Developer Discussion > Subject: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] session.insertContent > vsxdmp:document-insert > > Hi Robert, > > I am not a much of a Java guy, so others might be better to comment on this > one, but I think the difference is that with session.insertContent, you are > using Java to stream in the content to MarkLogic Server. With > xdmp:document-insert, you are using XQuery to create the content in memory to > insert. If you have a large amount of content on the client machine (where > the XCC program is running) to load, then it makes sense to use > insertContent. I believe this is what the open source project RecordLoader > does (http://developer.marklogic.com/code/#recordloader). > > -Danny > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Runstein, > Robert E. (Contr) (IS) > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 8:01 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] session.insertContent vs xdmp:document-insert > > > What is the difference between session.insertContent and > xdmp:document-insert? When using xcc is there any advantage to using one > over the other? Thanks. > > Bob > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
