Hi,

I've run into an odd difference in the behavior of
cts:element-attribute-value-query() as oppposed to
cts:element-value-query().  (To tell the truth, neither one of them
behaves exactly like I would prefer, but for now I'm just trying to
figure out what is making the difference between them.)  Assume the
following four sample documents are in the database:

*       <testNode insertDate="10JUN2009" />
*       <testNode insertDate="10JUN2009-0849" />
*       <testNode>
    <insertDate>10JUN2009</insertDate>
</testNode>
*       <testNode>
    <insertDate>10JUN2009-0849</insertDate>
</testNode>

Wildcard searches are enabled, but pretty much all other settings for
the Documents database are default.

Executing this query:

        cts:search(/testNode,
cts:element-value-query(xs:QName("insertDate"), "10JUN2009*"))

returns a single result, as expected:

        <testNode>
            <insertDate>10JUN2009</insertDate>
        </testNode>

On the contrary, executing this query:

        cts:search(/testNode,
cts:element-attribute-value-query(xs:QName("testNode"),
xs:QName("insertDate"), "10JUN2009*"))

returns an empty sequence, which is inconsistent with the behavior of
the element-value-query.  Further complicating matters, executing an
otherwise identical, case-insensitive version of the above query:

        cts:search(/testNode,
cts:element-attribute-value-query(xs:QName("testNode"),
xs:QName("insertDate"), "10jun2009*"))

returns a single result:

        <testNode insertDate="10JUN2009" />

which is what I expected the first query to return!

Note that if I remove the trailing wildcard, the case-sensitive and
case-insensitive versions both return the same result, so the
discrepancy seems to exist only for an element-attribute-value-query (or
element-attribute-word-query) that combines case-sensitivity with a
wildcard.

I'd appreciate any ideas you can throw out.

Thanks,

Doug Glidden
Software Engineer
The Boeing Company
[email protected]

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to