Hi Tim,

I'm not an expert on co-occurrences, but it sound a bit like you forgot to add 
the query parameter to the cts:frequency call. If that is not the problem, can 
you include sample code to demonstrate your issue?

Kind regards,
Geert

>


Drs. G.P.H. Josten
Consultant


http://www.daidalos.nl/
Daidalos BV
Source of Innovation
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665 JZ Bleiswijk
Tel.: +31 (0) 10 850 1200
Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199
http://www.daidalos.nl/
KvK 27164984
De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van 
Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit 
bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit 
bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.


> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> Tim Meagher
> Sent: vrijdag 12 juni 2009 17:18
> To: 'General Mark Logic Developer Discussion'
> Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Frequency of co-occurrences
> using cts:element-attribute-value-co-occurrences()
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I am familiar with using cts:frequency to get the number of
> occurrences of a unique element value in a lexicon using
> cts:element-values(), but I'm wondering how to find the
> number of co-occurrences between an element and attribute
> using cts:element-attribute-value-co-occurrences().  Is there
> a distinct result for each element/attribute pair found in a
> fragment, and if so, how would one obtain the number of
> co-occurrences for a unique element/attribute value pair?
>
>
>
> I'm under the impression that performing a cts:frequency on
> the value of an element returned by the
> cts:element-attribute-value-co-occurrences will return the
> number of occurrences of that value in its corresponding
> lexicon, not in the results of the call to
> cts:element-attribute-value-co-occurrences().
>
>
>
> Thanks for the help,
>
>
>
> Tim Meagher - AAOM Consulting
>
>
>
>

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to