Hi Karl, > That said, I did try your test and got the expected result. > Then I repeated it using a named namespace (and changed the > indexes to match) > -- same result. > > However, by the reasoning in my first paragraph, I don't see > how differing content could cause the behavior I described > (and, though my document obviously has differences to the > test case you described, I wouldn't know where to begin in > identifying any "significant" > differences). Do you agree with my reasoning? Any other ideas?
Yes, it doesn't make sense to blame the data. But still, Danny's test succeeds, while yours didn't. So there has to be some difference. Did you run the query you mentioned exactly as written? And just to get a better idea of your content, could you insert a complete example document as well (if it is not too large)? The latest version is 4.1-4. I don't really expect this to make much difference here, but you never know: could you upgrade? Kind regards, Geert Drs. G.P.H. Josten Consultant http://www.daidalos.nl/ Daidalos BV Source of Innovation Hoekeindsehof 1-4 2665 JZ Bleiswijk Tel.: +31 (0) 10 850 1200 Fax: +31 (0) 10 850 1199 http://www.daidalos.nl/ KvK 27164984 De informatie - verzonden in of met dit emailbericht - is afkomstig van Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend. _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general
