> Concerning performance: I am afraid that the solutions Ken came up with were 
> not very optimized for large sequences. They have a logarithmic complexity. 
> Let me provide a solution that has a linear complexity:

Shouldn't that be exponential...  logarithmic is better than linear
isn't it?  :)


cheers
-- 
Andrew Welch
http://andrewjwelch.com
Kernow: http://kernowforsaxon.sf.net/
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to