Hi Karl,

> Okay, thanks again.  The solution I'm leaning towards
> (assuming I will use this document modeling approach)
> involves a couple of the things we've discussed.  I'll get a
> query like "physician-lastname:williams chief-complaint:aches
> test-name:rdw test-value 14.6".  I'll know that the
> constraint groups are as follows:  A = {physician-lastname,
> chief-complaint}; B = {test-name, test-value}.  I'll run a
> search on group A using a <searchable-expression> that
> constrains to section A.
> Then I'll run a search on group B using a different
> <searchable-expression> and an <additional-query> with a
> cts:document-query containing all the results from the search on A.
> That's two searches, but there would be N searches for N
> sections (I expect N <= ~7).

This sounds as the right way to do it.

It might be obvious, but if there is reason to believe a certain section is 
likely to be usually most restrictive, or there is a way to guess which section 
will be most restrictive given the entered criteria: do the most restrictive 
searches first..

> As for highlighting, I guess the above strategy would lose
> highlighting except for the last search performed.  Maybe I
> can save the search:highlight nodes from each search and do
> some recombining at the end.  It's not a painless strategy,
> but I think it will work for small numbers of sections and
> documents of "reasonable" size.

Sounds cumbersome, but it could work..

Kind regards,
Geert



drs. G.P.H. (Geert) Josten
Consultant


Daidalos BV
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665 JZ Bleiswijk

T +31 (0)10 850 1200
F +31 (0)10 850 1199

mailto:[email protected]
http://www.daidalos.nl/

KvK 27164984

P Please consider the environment before printing this mail.
De informatie - verzonden in of met dit e-mailbericht - is afkomstig van 
Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit 
bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit 
bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to