Hi David,

> As I write this though I had an idea.  Since the only issue
> is requests coming from the same server, maybe I could make
> an App server bound to
> 127.0.0.1 instead of 0.0.0.0 ... this would then limit access
> to the server itself.
> Alternatively I could also take advantage of the firewall to make sure
> that whatever port was open wasnt open to external uses.   This way I
> could setup a app server just for image fetches and secure it
> without authentication.

Since you can reasonably trust the FO processor to not misuse security 
information, you might be able to use url scheme's like 
http://user:p...@localhost:nnnn/getimage.xqy. It is legal, though most browsers 
tend to block such requests, pretending not to understand them, for the sake of 
security. Basic auth over HTTP isn't very secure, but this is even less. 
Sticking to localhost though, there is no reason to fear sniffing of the 
credentials.

I am not sure binding the app server to a specific ip works as you think. If 
I'm not mistaken it doesn't work as a filter, but as a bind. There should be 
some messages about that on the ML mailinglist. You might also be able to apply 
ip-filtering from within a rewrite script..

Kind regards,
Geert



drs. G.P.H. (Geert) Josten
Consultant


Daidalos BV
Hoekeindsehof 1-4
2665 JZ Bleiswijk

T +31 (0)10 850 1200
F +31 (0)10 850 1199

mailto:[email protected]
http://www.daidalos.nl/

KvK 27164984

P Please consider the environment before printing this mail.
De informatie - verzonden in of met dit e-mailbericht - is afkomstig van 
Daidalos BV en is uitsluitend bestemd voor de geadresseerde. Indien u dit 
bericht onbedoeld hebt ontvangen, verzoeken wij u het te verwijderen. Aan dit 
bericht kunnen geen rechten worden ontleend.

_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://xqzone.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to