Hi Shannon,

Thanks for the answer. The answer may solve my purpose. I think this might
be the case.

-- Debabrata --

On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Shannon <[email protected]> wrote:

> The data is being tokenized on whitespace, and you're introducing
> whitespace. Wouldn't the following solve the problem?
>
> <Title>Magnetic anisotropy data of
> C<Subscript>24</Subscript>H<Subscript>12</Subscript></Title>
>
> Just a guess….
>
> On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:40 PM, Shannon wrote:
>
> > Hi Debabarata,
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, you want a "Word-Through" which is not currently
> supported. MarkLogic has filed an RFE (#5849, "Enable per-database
> word-through specifications", as well as a Word-Around) for consideration in
> a future release. We have requested that this be implemented in v4.3. The
> only work-around I know of is to duplicate the data to index the word token
> in its entirety.
> >
> > On Aug 24, 2010, at 1:07 PM, Debabrata Jena wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> This is regarding not being able to search in for a phrase/search term
> in an element in which phrase is combination of text and node . Please find
> the details below and sample data attached.
> >> Use Case : search for a phrase in which phrase is a combination of text
> and node. For ex. search for "Magnetic anisotropy data of C24H12" Following
> is the XML representation for the same phrase :
> >>   <Title>
> >>        Magnetic anisotropy data of C
> >>       <Subscript>24</Subscript>
> >>        H
> >>       <Subscript>12</Subscript>
> >>   </Title>
> >> Approach followed: Added Phrase Through element for Subscript element so
> that text inside the Subscript element can be search able.
> >>
> >> Current State : we are not able to search for a following text "Magnetic
> anisotropy data of C24H12" in Title element by using cts:element-query.
> However, we are able to search for the same text if we pass the search term
> with spaces as following "Magnetic anisotropy data of C 24 H 12" in the
> cts:element-query.
> >> Please advise what else needs to be done so that we can search
> successfully for the above scenario.
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Debabarata
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> General mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to