The RFE process wrt MarkLogic has always been something I have failed to understand. The process has historically (from my perspective) been to meet with individual customers but never to my knowledge have there been meetings where entire groups of customers have been collectively involved to prioritize the community needs. I personally believe these types of interactions could be very valuable (for MarkLogic and their customers). Other frequent requests I have heard over the years (from other customers via informal discussions) have been to allow full xpath expressions (instead of a single qname) when defining indexes, fragmentation policies etc. I'm sure other customers could list representative examples as well. However, these requests never seem to make the final cut (for possibly very valid reasons). It would seem that the upcoming user conference might be a good opportunity to possibly begin experimenting with the idea of collectively working together with the user community to define the next set of features.
Darin. ________________________________ From: Michael Sokolov <soko...@ifactory.com> To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion <general@developer.marklogic.com> Cc: Shannon <shifl...@virginia.edu> Sent: Mon, April 11, 2011 6:32:14 PM Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Ignore inline style tags while search +1 to the cause here - we see this problem occasionally, too. Do you have a URL to submit an RFE? -Mike On 4/11/2011 1:52 PM, Shannon wrote: Abhishek, submitting an RFE would help the cause :-) > > >On Apr 11, 2011, at 1:38 PM, Abhishek53 S wrote: > >Hi Shannon/Danny >> Thanks for reply. I guess there is no way except to >> place >>the duplicate entry into my searchable content. >> >>Currently I am using 4.2 version of Marklogic. I guess >>the >>word-through /phrase-through features will be supported >>in >>future versions of Marklogic. >>Correct me If I am wrong! >> >>Thanks and Regards >>Abhishek Srivastav >>Assistant Systems Engineer >>Tata Consultancy Services >>Plot B-1, Block EP & GP, Sector 5 >>Salt Lake Electronics Complex, >>Kolkata - 700 091,West Bengal >>India >>Cell:- +91-9883389968 >>Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com >>Website: http://www.tcs.com/ >>____________________________________________ >>Experience certainty. IT Services >>Business Solutions >>Outsourcing >>____________________________________________ >> >> >>-----general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com wrote: ----- >> >> >>To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion >><general@developer.marklogic.com> >>>From: Danny Sokolsky <danny.sokol...@marklogic.com> >>>Sent by: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>>Date: 04/11/2011 09:46PM >>>Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Ignore inline style >>>tags >>>while search >>> >>> >>>Hi Shannon, >>> >>>I can’t really comment on the odds. But it is not a >>>super >>>easy thing to do. >>> >>>-Danny >>> >>>From:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>>[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On Behalf Of Shannon >>>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 9:09 AM >>>To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion >>>Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Ignore inline >>>style tags while search >>> >>>Hey Danny, what are the odds we'll see a >>>"word-through" >>>feature in a future release? We have an RFE in on >>>this, >>>and this is a fairly frequent use case. >>> >>> Shannon (shifl...@virginia.edu) >>> http://www.facebook.com/uvapress >>> http://www.twitter.com/uvapress >>> >>>On Apr 11, 2011, at 12:05 PM, Danny Sokolsky wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>Hi Abhishek, >>> >>>When that is tokenized, it is tokenized as two >>>terms, not one (because tokens cannot cross an >>>element boundary). That is why the >>>phrase-through >>>approach does not work. The way I have heard of >>>people dealing with this is to pre-process their >>>content, transforming that to be one term. >>>Something like turning this: >>> >>><p><b>R</b>epository</p> >>> >>>Into >>> >>><p><word b=”R”>Repository</word></p> >>> >>>The idea here is to have the attributes contain >>>enough information for the application to style >>>the >>>text appropriately. To make this work for all >>>cases, it is fairly tricky. Alternately, you >>>can >>>put the word token in an attribute, but then you >>>will have to explicitly search for it. >>> >>><p><word searchable=”Repository”><b>R</b>epository</word</p> >>> >>>It depends on your app which will be >>>easier/better. >>> The second way allows you to deal with multiple >>> >>>mark-up items in a word easier. >>> >>>-Danny >>> >>> >>> >>>From: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>>[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] On >>> Behalf Of Abhishek53 >>> >>>S >>>Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 8:00 AM >>>To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion >>>Cc: General MarkLogic Developer >>>Discussion; general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>>Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Ignore >>>inline >>>style tags while search >>> >>> >>>Dear Geert >>> >>>Thanks for your reply ! Yes the phrase through has >>>already include the element b,I,i without any >>>namespace. But still the result is matching for >>>the >>>search term >>> >>>Thanks & Regards >>> >>>Abhishek Srivastav >>>Assistant Systems Engineer >>>Tata Consultancy Services >>>Plot B-1, Block EP & GP, Sector 5 >>>Salt Lake Electronics Complex, >>>Kolkata - 700 091,West Bengal >>>India >>>Cell:- +91-9883389968 >>>Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com >>>Website: http://www.tcs.com >>>____________________________________________ >>>Experience certainty. IT Services >>> Business Solutions >>> Outsourcing >>>____________________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>>From: Geert Josten >>><geert.jos...@daidalos.nl> >>> >>>To: General MarkLogic Developer >>>Discussion >>><general@developer.marklogic.com> >>> >>>Date: 04/11/2011 08:12 PM >>>Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] >>>Ignore >>>inline style tags while search >>> >>>Sent by: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>> >>> ________________________________ >>> >>> >>> >>>Hi Abhishek, >>> >>>Have you tried configuring these element as >>> >>>‘Phrase-throughs’? You can find that in the >>>database >>>configuration in the Admin console. >>> >>>Kind regards, >>>Geert >>> >>>Van: general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com >>>[mailto:general-boun...@developer.marklogic.com] Namens Abhishek53 >>> S >>>Verzonden: maandag 11 april 2011 16:37 >>>Aan: general@developer.marklogic.com >>>Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] Ignore inline >>>style tags while search >>> >>>Dear All >>>I want to ignore the inline markup style tags like >>><b> >>>and <I> during my word search Like I have my content >>>as >>><content>Marklogic <b>R</b>epository </content> >>>I am using search:search API and sending the search >>>term >>>as "Repository".This is not returning me any result >>>Please let me know how to achieve >>>Thanks in advance ! >>> >>>Abhishek Srivastav >>>Assistant Systems Engineer >>>Tata Consultancy Services >>>Plot B-1, Block EP & GP, Sector 5 >>>Salt Lake Electronics Complex, >>>Kolkata - 700 091,West Bengal >>>India >>>Cell:- +91-9883389968 >>>Mailto: abhishek5...@tcs.com >>>Website: http://www.tcs.com >>>____________________________________________ >>>Experience certainty. IT Services >>> Business Solutions >>> Outsourcing >>>____________________________________________ >>>=====-----=====-----===== >>>Notice: The information contained in this e-mail >>>message and/or attachments to it may contain >>>confidential or privileged information. If you are >>>not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, >>>review, distribution, printing or copying of the >>>information contained in this e-mail message >>>and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. >If >>>you have received this communication in error, >>>please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and >>>immediately and permanently delete the message >>>and any attachments. Thank you >>>_______________________________________________ >>>General mailing list >>>General@developer.marklogic.com >>>http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >>> >>> >>>=====-----=====-----===== >>>Notice: The information contained in this e-mail >>>message and/or attachments to it may contain >>>confidential or privileged information. If you are >>>not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, >>>review, distribution, printing or copying of the >>>information contained in this e-mail message >>>and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If >>>you have received this communication in error, >>>please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and >>>immediately and permanently delete the message >>>and any attachments. Thank you >>> >>> >>> >>>_______________________________________________ >>>General mailing list >>>General@developer.marklogic.com >>>http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >>> _______________________________________________ >>>General mailing list >>>General@developer.marklogic.com >>>http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >>> > >>=====-----=====-----===== Notice: The information contained in this e-mail >>message and/or attachments to it may contain confidential or privileged >>information. If you are not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use, >>review, distribution, printing or copying of the information contained in >>this >>e-mail message and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If you >>have >>received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail or >>telephone and immediately and permanently delete the message and any >>attachments. Thank you >> _______________________________________________ >>General mailing list >>General@developer.marklogic.com >>http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >> > > _______________________________________________ General mailing list >General@developer.marklogic.com >http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >
_______________________________________________ General mailing list General@developer.marklogic.com http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
