Hi Colleen

Thanks for your reply.

Requirement is to create the union source of value and field word 
lexicons. As per my understanding we lost phrase information if we are 
going for only word lexicons whereas if I create the value lexicons over 
the elements having large text then it will abruptly consume more disc 
space.

We decided to go for a combined approach having field word lexicons over 
large text field and the value lexicons for some selected fields.

Let me know if you have some more idea.

Kind Regards
Abhishek Srivastav
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +91-9883389968
Mailto: [email protected]
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty.   IT Services
                        Business Solutions
                        Outsourcing
____________________________________________



From:
Colleen Whitney <[email protected]>
To:
General MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]>
Cc:
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date:
07/10/2011 11:10 PM
Subject:
Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Mixed suggestion source for autosuggest.
Sent by:
[email protected]



Hi Abhishek,

The default suggestion source doesn't accept more than one source, 
unfortunately.  (If you're not sure, you can always use 
search:check-options($options, true()) to check the structure of your 
options node and see if your index configuration supports the options 
you've specified.)

One question:  what would you expect the behavior to be if you specified 
two default sources?  Would it be an intersection of the two, or fallback 
behavior of some kind?  I'm interested in understanding why you need to 
combine them; there might be another way to accomplish what you need (or a 
case for an RFE).

--Colleen

________________________________________
From: [email protected] 
[[email protected]] On Behalf Of Abhishek53 S 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2011 10:16 AM
To: General MarkLogic Developer Discussion
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Mixed suggestion source for autosuggest.

Hi Folks

I required some mixed default-suggestion-source for autosuggest i.e. both 
range and field-word-lexicon. Individualy both are working fine but in 
case of both as a combined source of suggestion it is returning empty 
sequence. Following is my sample query

xquery version "1.0-ml";
import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";
    at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search.xqy";
let $searchTerm := "che"
let $options :=
<search:options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";>
<default-suggestion-source>
    <range type="xs:string">
        <element name="additional"/>
    </range>
    <word>
        <field name="autosuggest"/>
    </word>
</default-suggestion-source>
</search:options>
return
search:suggest($searchTerm ,$options ,1000)


Let me know if I am wrong somewhere. Or it is not possible with 
search:suggest
Thanks in advance!
Abhishek Srivastav
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +91-9883389968
Mailto: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Outsourcing
____________________________________________



=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you



_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general


_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to