Thanks Jason. Actually, by using 'sample' (or I guess truncate) seems to bring in the effect of scoring associated with the cts:query. This is what I was trying to figure out ... Guess the documentation could be a bit more clear ;-) But, in my case, since I was trying to limit the query to 1 result anyway (by using limit=1), I can achieve the same result by doing sample=1.
Thanks. Darin. On 7/26/11 2:10 PM, "Jason Hunter" <[email protected]> wrote: >> Anyway, I'm performing a cts:uris query to retrieve values from the URI >>lexicon. I would like the URIS that I retrieve from this lexicon to be >>ordered by the score (score-simple) that was used in the cts:query >>component to filter the cts:uri query. Reading the documentation, this >>sounds feasible (otherwise, why would the documentation list all of the >>scoring/ordering options). > >My understanding is the scoring options are there so when you're >truncating you can get values from the top N most relevant documents. >There's no public way to request ordering by score, and I've never heard >of an undocumented way. Sounds like a good RFE. > >You can use cts:search() of course, calling document-uri() or base-uri() >on the each result. It'll work, with the cost of some disk access >proportional to the number of result items examined. > >-jh- > >_______________________________________________ >General mailing list >[email protected] >http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
