I'm not aware of anything aside from database-set-range-index-optimize to 'facet-time', and that is the default setting.
The applications I'm working with right now that have migrated to ML5 haven't seen a drop in performance. Maybe it's something specific about the use-case? If you can provide some kind of test case, I'm sure support would be interested. -- Mike On 23 May 2012, at 10:07 , Alan Darnell wrote: > We have been working on migrating a 2TB MarkLogic database from a v 4 cluster > to a v 5 cluster. We transferred the data and reindexed it for ML5. We are > seeing slower response times from the ML5 cluster (which is using more > powerful hardware) when we use frequency-order as an option to > cts:element-values(). > > Are there best practices in ML 5 for tuning indexes to be used to return > facet values with frequency counts? > > Alan > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://community.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://community.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
