Danny Sokolsky wrote:
Hi, > Ah, I see. It looks like error:name is a string, so if you want the > QName to be resolvable, you will have to send it with your error > call. There is a 3rd param to fn:error that you can use to send it. Yes, I already use it to send some structured information, I can find a place for that info. But I think this is a defect: if there is a QName as content (like in XML Schema, or even in XSLT with XPath expressions), the corresponding mapping should be in scope (or saved in another piece of content, as an alternative, like in Schematron)... Thanks! Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsulting.be/ _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
