Hi Mike, I don't think that works in 4.1.
For: xquery version "1.0-ml"; import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search"; at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search.xqy"; search:parse('stemmed:creditor AND blue', <options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";> <constraint name="stemmed"> <word> <term-option>stemmed</term-option> </word> </constraint> </options>) ==> <cts:and-query qtextjoin="AND" strength="20" xmlns:cts="http://marklogic.com/cts";> <cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text"> <cts:text>blue</cts:text> </cts:word-query> </cts:and-query> I guess that this type of constraint syntax is not "understood" in 4.1? David -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Michael Blakeley Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 1:59 PM To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using search api (Geert Josten) Here's what I tried, which seems to work using 6.0-1.1: import module namespace search = "http://marklogic.com/appservices/search"; at "/MarkLogic/appservices/search/search.xqy"; search:parse( 'blue AND green AND stemmed:ran', <options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";> <constraint name="stemmed"> <word><term-option>stemmed</term-option></word></constraint></options>) => <cts:and-query qtextjoin="AND" strength="20" qtextgroup="( )" xmlns:cts="http://marklogic.com/cts";> <cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text"> <cts:text>blue</cts:text> </cts:word-query> <cts:word-query qtextref="cts:text"> <cts:text>green</cts:text> </cts:word-query> <cts:word-query qtextpre="stemmed:" qtextref="cts:annotation"> <cts:annotation qtextref="following-sibling::cts:text"/> <cts:text>ran</cts:text> <cts:option>stemmed</cts:option> </cts:word-query> </cts:and-query> -- Mike On 17 Oct 2012, at 09:08 , "Steiner, David J. (LNG-DAY)" <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's a similar situation: > Using 4.1, > I have an unstemmed database. However the user searching it occasionally > know she/he wants to search for the stemmed version of one of their terms. > The "term" option applies to all terms in a document and the constraint would > only apply to specific element(s) for value or word. > > I want to do something like allow: blue AND green AND stemmed:ran That > is, I want to search the entire document for unstemmed versions of "blue" and > "green" and the stemmed version of "ran." > > However, I'm not really seeing how to construct that constraint without > simply listing all elements of a document in the constraint. > > <options xmlns="http://marklogic.com/appservices/search";> > <constraint name="stemmed"> > <word> > <term-option>stemmed</term-option> > <element name="my-element1"/> > </word> > <word> > <term-option>stemmed</term-option> > <element name="my-element2"/> > </word> > ... > </constraint> > > Which actually appears to not be allowed - you can only get one element in > word or only one word in a constraint (even though check-options gives no > error). When I try this I get: > [1.0-ml] XDMP-ARGTYPE: (err:XPTY0004) fn:QName("", > (xs:NCName("my-element1"), xs:NCName("my-element2"))) -- arg2 is not > of type xs:string > > > So, > 1) Does this even work, perhaps in a later version of ML? > 2) Is there a better/easier way to do what I'm trying to do? > 3) I suppose I could create a field that is made up of every element > then use that field in the constraint? > > > Thanks, > David > > > > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Geert > Josten > Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 9:37 AM > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using > search api (Geert Josten) > > Hi Amit, > > From what I read in the docs, the <term> option (which is one of two that > allows <term-option>s, <constraint> being the other) is not to apply > term-options generally, but specifically for unconstraint searches. So, if > you search for something like: > > foo or xx:bar > > Then the term-options within <term> are applied to 'foo'. The term-options > within <constraint name="xx"> are applied to 'bar'.. > > Kind regards, > Geert > > Van: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens amit gope > Verzonden: vrijdag 17 augustus 2012 14:54 > Aan: [email protected] > Onderwerp: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language > using search api (Geert Josten) > > Hi Geert, > > My search options has almost 20 constraints and when i add the term option as > unstemmed to be common for all the constaints it doesn't work, but when i > provide the term-option value unstemmed to individual constraints then it > works, why this is happening, is this a feature of search api to provide > separate term option? > > > -- > Regards > Amit > > On 17 August 2012 00:30, <[email protected]> wrote: > Send General mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [email protected] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [email protected] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of General digest..." > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Natural language version of a query? (Tim Finney) > 2. Query on multiple language using search api (amit gope) > 3. Re: Natural language version of a query? (Geert Josten) > 4. Re: Query on multiple language using search api (Geert Josten) > 5. Local-disk forest failover (Danny Sinang) > 6. Re: Local-disk forest failover (Michael Blakeley) > 7. Re: Local-disk forest failover (Wayne Feick) > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tim Finney <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2012 18:29:12 -0300 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query? > Hi All, > > Has anyone here tried to produce a natural language equivalent of a > search string or the kind used in search:search? As an example, here > is an imaginary search string: > > cat OR dog (author:"Smith, John" OR author:"Jones, Thomas") > date-after:1984-03-01 date-before:1991-05-31 > > I'd like to end up with something like this: > > cat OR dog with authors "Smith, John" OR "Jones, Thomas" AND after > 1984-03-01 AND before 1991-05-31 > > (Things are complicated by parentheses, NEAR, NOT, ...) > > Are there any built-in functions for doing such a thing? > > Best, > > Tim Finney > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: amit gope <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:42:18 +0530 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using > search api Hello All, > > Can anyone please help me out queering on multiple languages using search > api. In my database i have documents of different languages (en, de, fr) to > name a few. Currently when i do not provide any language specification it > returns me contents from only english. How do i mention the language > constraint to include the search for languages de and fr as well? > > > Regards > Amit > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Geert Josten <[email protected]> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:22:13 +0200 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query? > Hi Tim, > > There is a grammar option in search:search options, but haven't looked > into that myself yet. Perhaps the documentation can make clear whether > you can use that or not. > > Alternative is to pre-process the search query yourself. You can try > to tackle it with regex, but it might be more fun to write a grammar > for it and use the handy site maintained by Gunther Rademacher to > generate XQuery code out of it: > > http://www.bottlecaps.de/rex/ > > Kind regards, > Geert > > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens Tim Finney > Verzonden: woensdag 15 augustus 2012 23:29 > Aan: [email protected] > Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] Natural language version of a query? > > Hi All, > > Has anyone here tried to produce a natural language equivalent of a > search string or the kind used in search:search? As an example, here > is an imaginary search string: > > cat OR dog (author:"Smith, John" OR author:"Jones, Thomas") > date-after:1984-03-01 date-before:1991-05-31 > > I'd like to end up with something like this: > > cat OR dog with authors "Smith, John" OR "Jones, Thomas" AND after > 1984-03-01 AND before 1991-05-31 > > (Things are complicated by parentheses, NEAR, NOT, ...) > > Are there any built-in functions for doing such a thing? > > Best, > > Tim Finney > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Geert Josten <[email protected]> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:25:46 +0200 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using > search api Hi Amit, > > Haven't tried, but you should be able to add > <term-option>lang=en</term-option><term-option>lang=de</term-option><term-option>lang=fr</term-option> > to the relevant constraint.. > > Kind regards, > Geert > > PS: I'm wondering whether it would also accept lang=en,de,fr, but the docs > don't seem to indicate so.. > > Van: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] Namens amit gope > Verzonden: donderdag 16 augustus 2012 8:12 > Aan: [email protected] > Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] Query on multiple language using > search api > > Hello All, > > Can anyone please help me out queering on multiple languages using search > api. In my database i have documents of different languages (en, de, fr) to > name a few. Currently when i do not provide any language specification it > returns me contents from only english. How do i mention the language > constraint to include the search for languages de and fr as well? > > > Regards > Amit > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Danny Sinang <[email protected]> > To: general <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 11:00:54 -0400 > Subject: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover Hi, > > When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just > became the primary forest) need to reindex ? > > Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to some > other cluster members ? > > Regards, > Danny > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Michael Blakeley <[email protected]> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:23:30 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover No on > both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the > mirrors, and they are exact copies. > > This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a > forest failure immediately - not weeks later, when the replica fails and the > whole database goes offline. > > -- Mike > > On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just > > became the primary forest) need to reindex ? > > > > Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to > > some other cluster members ? > > > > Regards, > > Danny > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Wayne Feick <[email protected]> > To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 10:33:39 -0700 > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Local-disk forest failover A > slight refinement; replicas are equivalent copies rather than exact copies. > You'll have the same fragments, but likely organized differently into stands. > > Wayne > > > Michael Blakeley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > No on both questions. Forest replication is just like RAID-1. You set up the > mirrors, and they are exact copies. > > This underscores the importance of monitoring. You want to find out about a > forest failure immediately - not weeks later, when the replica fails and the > whole database goes offline. > > -- Mike > > On 16 Aug 2012, at 08:00 , Danny Sinang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > When a local-disk failover happens, will the replica forest (which just > > became the primary forest) need to reindex ? > > > > Also, will the surviving cluster node try to replicate the new forest to > > some other cluster members ? > > > > Regards, > > Danny > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > General mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > > > > > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
