Apart from this, I don't see why delete doc and remove from collection
wouldn't work..

G.

> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Geert Josten [mailto:[email protected]]
> Verzonden: woensdag 26 juni 2013 13:37
> Aan: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
> Onderwerp: RE: [MarkLogic Dev General] Two document nodes at the same
> URI
>
> A similar case has been mentioned before on the list, perhaps search
with
> markmail to get hold of the conclusions back then. It had been
mentioned,
> I thought, that you can indeed create such a situation if you ingest a
> document in forest a, disconnect that, ingest it in forest b, than
connect
> a as well. I would expect MarkLogic to complain if you insert it twice
> explicitly pointing to two different forest, but haven't tried..
>
> Kind regards,
> Geert
>
> > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> > Van: [email protected] [mailto:general-
> > [email protected]] Namens Whitby, Rob
> > Verzonden: woensdag 26 juni 2013 13:28
> > Aan: MarkLogic Developer Discussion
> > Onderwerp: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Two document nodes at the
> same
> > URI
> >
> > Or if a forest is detached while documents are inserted
> >
> >
> > On 26 Jun 2013, at 12:24, David Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > This can also happen if you have put data into 2 forests explicitly
> and not
> > been very careful of guarenteeing URI uniqueness.
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---
> > > David Lee
> > > Lead Engineer
> > > MarkLogic Corporation
> > > [email protected]
> > > Phone: +1 812-482-5224
> > > Cell:  +1 812-630-7622
> > > www.marklogic.com
> > >
> > >
> > > From: [email protected] [mailto:general-
> > [email protected]] On Behalf Of Ellis Pritchard
> > > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 6:53 AM
> > > To: Florent Georges; MarkLogic Developer Discussion
> > > Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] Two document nodes at the same
> > URI
> > >
> > > Hi Florent,
> > >
> > > Could you have duplicate URIs in your database?
> > >
> > > I believe this situation could be created by turning locking off,
> perhaps
> > during a bulk load containing duplicate document URIs:
> > >
> > > .         locking specifies how robust transaction locking should
be.
> When
> > set to strict, locking enforces mutual exclusion on existing documents
> and
> > on new documents. When set to fast, locking enforces mutual exclusion
> on
> > existing and new documents. Instead of locking all the forests on new
> > documents, it uses a hash function to select one forest to lock. In
> general,
> > this is faster than strict. However, for a short period of time after
a
> new
> > forest is added, some of the transactions need to be retried
internally.
> > When set to off, locking does not enforce mutual exclusion on existing
> > documents or on new documents; only use this setting if you are sure
all
> > documents you are loading are new (a new bulk load, for example),
> > otherwise you might create duplicate URIs in the database.
> > >
> > > (from database Admin Help panel)
> > >
> > > Ellis.
> > >
> > >
> > > On 26 Jun 2013, at 11:43, Florent Georges <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >   Hi,
> > >
> > >   In a production environment on another project, at the client's I
am
> > > currently working for, they found a very weird situation.  It turns
> > > out that one document URI contains 2 document nodes.  This has been
> > > verified by the following queries:
> > >
> > >     count(doc('...'))
> > >        ==> 2
> > >
> > >     doc('...') instance of document-node()
> > >        ==> false
> > >
> > >     doc('...') instance of document-node()+
> > >        ==> true
> > >
> > >   Is anyone aware of that bug?  Is there anything we should pay
> > > attention to?  Is it possible to xdmp:document-delete it (them)?  Is
> > > it possible to remove it (them) from a collection they are part of?
> > >
> > >   MarkLogic version: 6.0-2.3.
> > >
> > >   Regards,
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Florent Georges
> > > http://fgeorges.org/
> > > http://h2oconsulting.be/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > General mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > General mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > General mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to