On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Geert Josten <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
>
>
> Separate collections for each sharing situation might not be necessary.
> Just keep read-access and owner-ship separate and clear..
>
>
>
>
Hmmm, okay. Now I am not sure what you are saying. My use case is that a
user may share read access with several users for several documents. But
not all users will get read access to all documents that are shared. (wow,
that sounds confusing).
Other users = A, B, C, D
User X's Collection:
doc1 - shared with A & C only
doc2 share with A & D only
doc3 shared with A,B,C & D
My thought about collections was that I would need a collection for each
scenario and then run the risk of having to have multiple copies of
documents. :-(
Maybe many roles is a solution?
MLHIM VIP Signup: http://goo.gl/22B0U
============================================
Timothy Cook, MSc +55 21 94711995
MLHIM http://www.mlhim.org
Like Us on FB: https://www.facebook.com/mlhim2
Circle us on G+: http://goo.gl/44EV5
Google Scholar: http://goo.gl/MMZ1o
LinkedIn Profile:http://www.linkedin.com/in/timothywaynecook
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
