Classification: Public Thanks Geert. FpML is indeed my issue, because FpML only changes namespace URI for major versions, but FpML documents contain a version number indicating the major & minor version of FpML that the sender was using. Ideally, the receiver should be able to use the same major/minor version Schemas for validation, etc. as the sender did, because strategies like using the latest minor version with the same major version mean that you have to trust that there are no backwards compatibility issues, not even subtle ones, and it's safer for production systems if you don't be too trusting.
As a general rule, I always discourage production systems from adding schema locations to XML files, because the receiver should decide which Schema(s) to use (if any), not the sender, just on security grounds. I see that you could modifying a temporary copy of an XML file, add any necessary schema locations and then validate it, that's an interesting idea. I also liked what others posted around using XSLT to do validation, that seems workable. However, that only helps for validation, it doesn't help you with enabling Schema-aware XQueries. It would be helpful if you could associate a collection of documents with a collection of Schemas, rather than only have the current coarser association of a database of documents to a database of Schemas. Cheers, Tony. ____________________________________________________ Anthony B. Coates (Tony) VP | Solution/Data Architect Deutsche Bank AG, Filiale London Global Technology and Operations (GTO) 1 Appold Street, EC2A 2UU London, United Kingdom Tel. +44(20)754-77217 Mobile +44(79)0543-9026 Email [email protected] From: "Geert J." <[email protected]> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]>, Date: 04/02/2014 21:09 Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] schema validation Hi Tony, You mean that the fpml xsd is using xsd:include to incorporate declarations from various files, all for the same targetNamespace, right? That could indeed cause trouble if you let MarkLogic try to find the top-level schema file itself. It will find multiple hits for the same targetNamespace, and doesn’t have logic to recognize there is a top-level file among them. You’d have to be lucky, if MarkLogic should find the correct one by itself. But you can point MarkLogic into the right direction. You can for instance use schemaLocation to specify a specific xsd file. You can also use schema imports to specify a specific file. If you point to the top-level file, I’d expect validation to work just fine.. Kind regards, Geert Van: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] Namens Anthony Coates Verzonden: dinsdag 4 februari 2014 17:14 Aan: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Onderwerp: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] schema validation Classification: Public The problem, as least for me sometimes, is that MarkLogic assumes you can select the Schema(s) based on the namespace URI, and so you are stuck if you need to select a specific Schema or set of Schemas where there isn't a 1-to-1 mapping between Schemas and namespace URIs (as often there isn't, e.g. for FpML). Cheers, Tony. ____________________________________________________ Anthony B. Coates (Tony) VP | Solution/Data Architect Deutsche Bank AG, Filiale London Global Technology and Operations (GTO) 1 Appold Street, EC2A 2UU London, United Kingdom Tel. +44(20)754-77217 Mobile +44(79)0543-9026 Email [email protected] From: "Geert J." <[email protected]> To: MarkLogic Developer Discussion <[email protected]>, Date: 04/02/2014 14:10 Subject: Re: [MarkLogic Dev General] schema validation Hi Rob, As far as I know, no. But you can specify a different database as Schemas database. It should in principle be possible to select a docs database itself as Schemas database.. Kind regards, Geert Van: [email protected] [mailto: [email protected]] Namens Whitby, Rob Verzonden: dinsdag 4 februari 2014 13:55 Aan: MarkLogic Developer Discussion Onderwerp: [MarkLogic Dev General] schema validation Hi, I can’t seem to figure out how to use a schema without loading it into the schemas db. Is something like this possible? let $xml := <foo>… let $schema := <xs:schema>… let $validate := ??? Thanks Rob _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures. _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general --- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and delete this e-mail. Any unauthorized copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. Please refer to http://www.db.com/en/content/eu_disclosures.htm for additional EU corporate and regulatory disclosures.
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
<<image/gif>>
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
