On Sunday, March 30, 2014, David Ennis <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Mike. > > Brilliant. Matches more-or-less what I expected (that using > directory-create hooked into a bigger beast under the hood that was more > than I needed). I am happy with 'implied' directories and still have the > ability to put a property on these fragments when needed. > > To be honest, I never thought of running xdmp:plan on the cts:directory > call.. That makes sense, but that Idea passed well over my head. > > Kind Regards, > David > > > On 29 March 2014 14:50, Michael Blakeley > <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> > > wrote: > >> Have you read >> http://blakeley.com/blogofile/2012/03/19/directory-assistance/ yet? >> >> -- Mike >> >> On 28 Mar 2014, at 23:08 , David Ennis >> <[email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> wrote: >> >> > HI. >> > >> > I am curious of the reason to use directory-create vs just attaching >> information to URIS ending on '/' >> > >> > creating directories allows for permissions, stec. This seems to be >> managed via properties on the path. >> > >> > If I do not need granular permission control, then what is the benefit >> of using xdmp:directory-create> >> > >> > Take this example: >> > xquery version "1.0-ml"; >> > declare namespace html = "http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";; >> > >> > (:let $dir1 := xdmp:directory-create('/foo/'):) >> > let $fakedir := xdmp:document-set-properties('/foo2/', >> <some_information>baz</some_information>) >> > let $insert := xdmp:document-insert('/foo/file1.xml', <something/>) >> > let $insert := xdmp:document-insert('/foo2/file1.xml', <something/>) >> > >> > >> > return <results> >> > >> <my_directory_listing>{xdmp:directory("/foo2/")}</my_directory_listing> >> > >> <properties_of_fake_dir>{xdmp:document-properties('/foo2/')}</properties_of_fake_dir> >> > </results> >> > >> > - I can put a property on /foo/ - allowing me to keep 'directory-level' >> information >> > - I can use xdmp:directory as well (even though it is not internally >> tagged as a directory) >> > - I can also use cts:uri-match for other uses, etc >> > >> > So.. Other than granular permissions, what benefit to I get by using >> 'directories' rather than building on the sample above? >> > >> > Regards, >> > David >> > _______________________________________________ >> > General mailing list >> > [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >> >> _______________________________________________ >> General mailing list >> [email protected]<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general >> > >
_______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
