In theory no. If all documents are known to be in the right forests, it could even be faster. Evaluation could use that knowledge to optimize queries and updates. For example if all documents are in the right forests, then a doc($uri) call only needs to check one forest.
However if the rebalancer has to move documents around, that's going to compete with other updates. And I'm not sure if there's a cost for the rebalancer itself to know whether or not it needs to move any documents around. -- Mike On 22 May 2014, at 05:28 , [email protected] wrote: > Hi All, > > Do we have think any overhead in keep enabling forest rebalacing for highly > transaction system? > > Thanks > Abhishek > This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the > intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged > information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please reply to the > sender and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized > review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of > this email, and/or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this > e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Where permitted by > applicable law, this e-mail and other e-mail communications sent to and from > Cognizant e-mail addresses may be monitored. > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general > _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
