If //foo/@bar is the right precision, use an element-attribute range index. If you need to specify a more general or a more precise XPath, use a path range index.
Given the same precision there should be no difference in query performance, because either index would contain the same values. For reindexing and ingestion a path index may be slower, depending on how complex it is to evaluate. -- Mike > On 6 Nov 2014, at 04:56 , manoj viswanadha <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I have a requirement to construct index on attributes. So based on the > performance > i just want to know the better option to go with either of > path-range-index/element-attribute-range index. > > Which of the above will give best performance and recommended to go with. > > Thanks, > Manoj Viswanadha, > cognizant-india. > _______________________________________________ > General mailing list > [email protected] > http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general _______________________________________________ General mailing list [email protected] http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
