I was hoping someone would have a better answer before I replied, but here
is my response.  Hopefully others will clarify  / build on it.


I do not think this will make a difference.  The reason being that I
understand that the way excluded and included elements actually works is
related to traversing the tree while creating the word indexes and
including or excluding parts of the tree in the indexing step.  Or even if
this statement inaccurate in some way, it is still related to the analysis
of the trees (even the tree structure in ML is a type of internal index
like a term list, but element A pointing to parent B rather than a term to
a fragment.

So, with the includes and excludes all related to the word queries and the
way the tree was indexed, I don't see how any range indexes will help this.

Perhaps someone will debunk this understanding and/or suggest some magic
combination of other approaches. Perhaps there is another way of creating a
field with an xpath expression of the ones to include and using a tuned
field-word-query on that or similiar.







Kind Regards,
David Ennis


David Ennis
*Content Engineer*

[image: HintTech]  <http://www.hinttech.com/>
Mastering the value of content
creative | technology | content

Delftechpark 37i
2628 XJ Delft
The Netherlands
T: +31 88 268 25 00
M: +31 63 091 72 80

[image: http://www.hinttech.com] <http://www.hinttech.com>
<https://twitter.com/HintTech>  <http://www.facebook.com/HintTech>
<http://www.linkedin.com/company/HintTech>

On 26 August 2015 at 04:45, Yang, Yun <[email protected]> wrote:

> Any advise? Appreciate the help.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 25, 2015, at 3:23 PM, Yang, Yun <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
>
>
> We use Word Query in our application. For the word query setting, in the
> excluded elements section, we have excluded one attribute based on the
> value. For example, in element *Content, *if attribute* Indexing = false,
> *we excluded from the word search. There are only two values in the
> attribute, true and false.
>
>
>
> *Question:*
>
> Does it worth to create an attribute range index for two distinct values
> to speed up the search? We have millions of the docs meet the condition for
> exclusion.
>
>
>
> *XML Sample:*
>
> <Content Indexing = “false”/>
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Yun Yang
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> Manage your subscription at:
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
[email protected]
Manage your subscription at: 
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to