Hi Justin,

I see...  Not an easy one.  Especially when these definitions are used to
create the TypeScript definition files, and then TypeScript insists that
you have an object, not a string (fortunately in this case, toString() is
our friend) :-)

Regards,

-- 
Florent Georges
http://fgeorges.org/
http://h2oconsulting.be/


On 26 August 2016 at 17:10, Justin Makeig wrote:

> If you look at the XQuery version <https://docs.marklogic.com/
> xdmp:get-request-field>, it returns item()*. This accounts for the cases
> where you've got strings zero, one, or many strings in
> application/x-www-form-urlencoded or binary in multipart/form-data.
>
> We're looking at ways to be more precise with how we document JavaScript
> types.
>
> Justin
>
> --
> Justin Makeig
> Director, Product Management
> MarkLogic
> jmak...@marklogic.com
>
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 2:23 AM, Florent Georges <li...@fgeorges.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> https://docs.marklogic.com/xdmp.getRequestField tells me that the
> function returns "Object?".  But "typeof" on the result of calling it (with
> a simple "param=value" in the URL) tells me "string".
>
> Is that a bug in the documentation?  Or does the notation "Object?" allows
> for a plain string as well?
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Florent Georges
> http://fgeorges.org/
> http://h2oconsulting.be/
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@developer.marklogic.com
> Manage your subscription at:
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General@developer.marklogic.com
> Manage your subscription at:
> http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
_______________________________________________
General mailing list
General@developer.marklogic.com
Manage your subscription at: 
http://developer.marklogic.com/mailman/listinfo/general

Reply via email to