Hi - have you looked at issues of Vector - for instance
http://archive.vector.org.uk/?qry=howard%20a.%20peelle - or the meeting
notes (particularly the "Beginner's Regatta") of NYCJUG?  For instance,
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/NYCJUG/2009-11-10#Beginner.27s_regatta,
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/NYCJUG/2012-03-14, and
http://www.jsoftware.com/jwiki/NYCJUG/2012-10-10.

On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:56 PM, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote:

> I have encountered similar issues - finding the right kinds of
> problems to tackle. (I hope that you do not mind that I am not Roger.)
>
> One trick, though, is that any problem for another language can be
> used as a problem in J. Of course, as you have noticed, sometimes
> difficulty is tricky.
>
> Another trick, though, is that you can solve problems in J just like
> you can in other languages. The result can be painfully slow, but
> that's not necessarily a problem. Often you can deal with speed issues
> by reducing the size of the problem.
>
> Also, once you have solved a problem in a slow way, you can work on
> rephrasing it, so that it is better. If you have a solution which is
> acceptably fast on some test data, you can set up a simple assert
> statement to compare a new version's behavior with the old version's
> behavior.
>
> Also, you can inspect the partial results (perhaps logging them, or
> some such) to get a better idea of what kinds of data you are working
> with. This can really help.
>
> Also, when problem difficulty is too steep, you can see if people here
> on the forums (or elsewhere) have any suggestions. We might not always
> have good suggestions (that depends) but sometimes we will (and
> sometimes difficulties can launch further efforts).
>
> And, for that matter, you might find it useful to leave a blog trail
> about problems you found that seem nice, or any other such thing (for
> others who find themselves in circumstances similar to yours).
>
> Finally, hello, and welcome!
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Raul
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 3:13 PM, Chel <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi Roger,
> >
> > I am new to the forum and found your thread in the archives.  I hope
> it’s not too late to send you my feedback.
> >
> > I’ve been working at getting more comfortable with J for a while.  I’m
> still very much a beginner, but I have learned quite a bit from “Learning
> J,” and I consider it to be the most valuable resource I’ve encountered
> thus far.
> >
> > Aside from one semester of computer science in college, everything I
> know about programming has come from sources on the internet.  I’ve learned
> a little bit about a lot of languages, enough to tweak code here and there,
> but I’m not an expert in any language.  From what I’ve seen so far, I like
> J a lot because it’s very different from other languages and you can do so
> much with so little.  But I have had a harder time progressing with it than
> with other languages because there aren’t as many resources available.
> >
> > One thing I haven’t had much luck finding are enough good puzzles or
> challenges to help me improve my skills and get me "thinking in J.”  Around
> the same time I started looking at J, I also started a Python-based CS101
> course they had on Udacity.com .  I think I was able to progress much
> faster in Python than in J, because the material was presented in a
> progressive way but also had good challenges to help ingrate the material
> covered after each section and incorporate the material from prior sections.
> >
> > I really appreciate "Learning J" because the material is presented very
> logically and clearly, but I have stalled a bit in my progression because I
> haven’t found enough challenges at my level.  I think I need a few more
> “homework problems” so I can absorb the material.  I have tried to invent a
> few challenges for myself, and I’ve looked on Rosetta Code.  But with J
> it’s a bit difficult because things that are hard in other languages might
> be super simple and easy in J, and things that are easy (or at least things
> I already know how to do) in other languages might not be so intuitive in
> J.  So I find there is a big gap between too easy and too hard, and I’ve
> had a hard time finding things in the middle to challenge myself.
> >
> > Perhaps there are other resources out there that I haven’t encountered
> yet, but if not, you might consider adding a few puzzles or challenges to
> go along with each chapter.  Everything is so thoughtfully presented that
> with the addition of a few challenges, in my opinion, Learning J would
> really become the perfect go-to resource for a beginner.
> >
> > Thank you!
> > Chel
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to