The guy loves his automated translation. As user @hoosierEE points out on the relevant question on SO, his J code was very likely originally written using the explicit style, which he then automatically converted to tacit using 13 :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31954474/which-programming-language-is-used-in-this-code#comment51943254_31954474 <http://stackoverflow.com/questions/31954474/which-programming-language-is-used-in-this-code#comment51943254_31954474> One wonders if he bothers to inspect the results of the machine translation (either the natural language or the computer code). -Dan > On Sep 17, 2015, at 5:27 PM, Mike Day <[email protected]> wrote: > > Seems to be Google-translated from Russian or other slavonic - > tasitnY, AyversonOM, menySTRIMNY and "in Prolog-E" are > strong pointers! Who's the author? > > Now to look at prologom... (should be accusative really!) > So far, I'm having trouble loading the script. It fails on the > first verb, frq ... Trying '''' instead of "'', it then fails on > "parse" ! > > His/her verbs are certainly tasitny! > > Thanks, > > Mike > > On 17/09/2015 16:23, 'Pascal Jasmin' via General wrote: >> I did not write this >> >> http://sysmagazine.com/posts/201470/ >> >> to see the internal representation, >> >> parse prolog_code >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
