> related, could we change profile definition Do you have examples where this makes a difference?
On 3 February 2016 at 14:11, 'Pascal Jasmin' via General < [email protected]> wrote: > related, could we change profile definition > > bind > 2 : 'x@(y"_)' > > to > > > bind =: 2 : 'u@(v"_)' > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: chris burke <[email protected]> > To: General forum <[email protected]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 3, 2016 5:02 PM > Subject: Re: [Jgeneral] x. y. documentation > > phrases was never considered part of the formal documentation and is out of > date in a few respects. It would be a worthwhile exercise to get this > updated. > > Most other uses of x. and y. should be fixed, though I just see one more in > the user docs. > > On 3 February 2016 at 13:02, Raul Miller <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://www.jsoftware.com/help/phrases/gerunds.htm has a line which > > yields a spelling error in j804: > > > > a5=: sel=: 1 : '] #~ ] x. {.' > > > > Personally, I think I would have insisted that 9!:48'' default to 1 > > until the documentation had been changed. But I guess that's just > > me... > > > > -- > > Raul > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
