Since segfault message is displayed in console. You need to run jqt from
terminal to see the message if any.

In the past, j terminates by executing exit() in j engine, but had been
changed to terminate by front-ends. I suspect there is some race condition
between shutdown of front-end and libj.so.

On Jan 3, 2018 1:46 PM, "J. Patrick Harrington" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm running jqt under Ubuntu 16.04 on my Dell XPS-13 laptop. Here is
>    JVERSION
> Engine: j806/j64/linux
> Release: commercial/2017-11-06T09:54:01
> Library: 8.06.09
> Qt IDE: 1.6.2/5.3.2
> Platform: Linux 64
> Installer: J806 install
>
> When I close with exit'', there is no seg fault. The window
> just disappears. I've never had a seg fault on exiting.
>
> Patrick
>
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, chris burke wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the additional info.
>>
>> I installed ubuntu 16.04 and sure enough got the segfault on exiting jqt.
>> I
>> then copied over my own build of jqt (using Qt 5.5 instead of 5.3 as
>> distributed) and no longer got the segfaults. Nor have I seen them yet on
>> my Linux Mint 18 cinnamon, even with the distributed jqt.
>>
>> I'll try to track this down, but since it only occurs on exit, I believe
>> it
>> should not affect the normal use of jqt.
>>
>> On Mint cinnamon and Ubuntu 16.04 nautilus (if set in the nautilus
>> preferences), clicking an executable shell script gives a prompt with
>> options which include "run in terminal" and "run".
>>
>> If "run in terminal" is selected, both jconsole and jqt show up.
>>
>> If "run" is selected, only jqt shows up, since jconsole requires a
>> terminal.
>>
>> Is there something like this prompt or preference in the mate file
>> manager?
>> It sounds like it is set to run shell scripts without a terminal.
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to