This bug has been fixed for armeabi-v7a, please update and check again.
Thanks.

On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 10:57 AM bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:

> By forcing android with armv8 cpu to run the armeabi-v7a binary, I can
> duplicate the crash.
> 0 +/@:E. 0     NB. ok
> 0 0 +/@:E. 0   NB. crash
>
> I will investigate.
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 12:51 AM bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Did anyone experience the same crash on j902 Android 32 (armeabi-v7a) ?
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:46 PM bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> They ran ok on my old android armeabi.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 4:37 PM Jan-Pieter Jacobs <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey Bill,
>>>>
>>>> yes, they do both.
>>>> I tried on Linux 64 bit Avx and there it is not a problem.
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Jan-Pieter
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, 11:56 bill lam <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I don't have android device with (armeabi-v7a) cpu. On android
>>>> (arm64-v8a)
>>>> > cpu, it didn't crash.
>>>> > Perhaps implementation code are different between 32 and 64 bit
>>>> platforms.
>>>> >
>>>> > Does it crash for simpler sentences such as,
>>>> >
>>>> > 1 2 3 +/@:E. (100#0), 1 2 3
>>>> > or
>>>> > 1 2 3 +/@:E. 100#2
>>>> >
>>>> > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020, 6:15 PM Jan-Pieter Jacobs <
>>>> > [email protected]>
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Good evening all,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I think I found a bug in j902-a:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > 'abc' +/@:E. (AlphaNum_j_ {~100 ?.@$ 62
>>>> > > 1 2 3 +/@:E. 100 ?.@$62
>>>> > >
>>>> > > these phrases reliably causes a segfault at least on Android:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >    JVERSION
>>>> > > Engine: j902/j32/android
>>>> > > Release-a: commercial/2020-12-10T11:15:49
>>>> > > Library: 9.02.08
>>>> > > J Android: 1.4.11/7.1.2/25
>>>> > > Platform: Android 32 (armeabi-v7a)
>>>> > > Installer: unknown
>>>> > > InstallPath:
>>>> > /storage/emulated/0/Android/data/com.jsoftware.j.android/files
>>>> > > Contact: www.jsoftware.com
>>>> > >
>>>> > > It might be in the special code, since defining (sum =: +/) and
>>>> using
>>>> > sum@
>>>> > > :E.
>>>> > > instead runs fine.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Congratulations with the new release though, your hard work is well
>>>> > > appreciated.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Best regards,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Jan-Pieter
>>>> > >
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > > For information about J forums see
>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>> > >
>>>> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> > For information about J forums see
>>>> http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>> >
>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>>>
>>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to