I disagree that JVERSION_NUMBER would be superior in this example. I launched a j64-807 instance of J and a j903 instance. I ran install'all' in both instances, then exited and restarted. In neither case was JVERSION_NUMBER defined.
This means that I would have to constrain deployment of the updates such that the test against JVERSION_NUMBER is unnecessary. Or am I missing something? Thanks, -- Raul On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:55 AM chris burke <cbu...@jsoftware.com> wrote: > > Thanks for pointing this out. > > The repo for the addon is https://github.com/earthspot/math_cal, see > the source directory . The jsoftware original has been archived. > > Your fix works, but a slightly better change for 9.4 and 9.5 would be > based on JVERSION_NUMBER, e.g. in the current beta: > > JVERSION_NUMBER > 9050005 > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 6:09 AM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > J's math/cal has a version test which needs to be fixed. > > > > On line 25, > > > > if. 900 < ". }. '/' taketo 9!:14'' do. > > > > should become > > > > if. 900 < ". }. '/' taketo rplc&'.0' 9!:14'' do. > > > > However, https://github.com/jsoftware/math_cal/blob/master/cal.ijs > > does not represent this script, so I cannot submit a fix through > > github. > > > > FYI, > > > > -- > > Raul > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
