Based on my scant usage of it, caching would t take more work than it's worth.
Henry Rich On Sun, Dec 17, 2023, 12:13 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:50 AM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > FYI: L. by itself is usually a mistake. It recurs through all boxing to > > the bitter end. Better to use (0 < L.) which allows early exit. > > Hmm... at least on 64 bit architectures, it seems like L. would > frequently be worth caching (might need a "don't know yet value" for > some operations), especially when it's small. > > That said, I don't know enough about header field use patterns to say > where this could best fit. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
