Based on my scant usage of it, caching would t take more work than it's
worth.

Henry Rich

On Sun, Dec 17, 2023, 12:13 PM Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 11:50 AM Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > FYI:  L. by itself is usually a mistake. It recurs through all boxing to
> > the bitter end. Better to use (0 < L.) which allows early exit.
>
> Hmm... at least on 64 bit architectures, it seems like L. would
> frequently be worth caching (might need a "don't know yet value" for
> some operations), especially when it's small.
>
> That said, I don't know enough about header field use patterns to say
> where this could best fit.
>
> --
> Raul
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to