On Wednesday 03 March 2004 23:05, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 3 Mar 2004, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >   Another small step... The edit-compile-test cycle is awfully long.
>
> In the case of excalibur-lifecycle vs excalibur-lifecycle-api, you
> could have run "ant verify" (less than a minute) inside the checked
> out Gump module.  This would have told you that there were projects
> depending on excalibur-lifecycle.

Are there any other 'features' ?

> If excalibur-lifecycle-api would be the better choice, we should
> probably adapt the projects that depend on it.

What _we_ (as in Avalon) should do is getting our shit together and unify all 
the divergent build organizations, if nothing else to simplify Gump builds.



-- 
+---------//-------------------+
|   http://www.bali.ac         |
|  http://niclas.hedhman.org   |
+------//----------------------+

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to