Date: 2004-03-12T07:22:17
Editor: 65.96.189.168 <>
Wiki: Gump Wiki
Page: Drafts/ProjectBylaws
URL: http://wiki.apache.org/gump/Drafts/ProjectBylaws
no comment
Change Log:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -34,8 +34,12 @@
''I'll suggest that a PMC vote is a good idea, and that "either" is actually a
good plan. People can ask and then the PMC can vote. Or the PMC can ask and vote and
people can then accept.'' -- LSD
+ ''I'm obviously biased but I think that 'just ask' is the way to go. I mean, the
gump PMC is mostly going to be dead since we don't really redistribute gump outside
anyway. What's the point of having to vote if the vote is always going to be positive
because there would be no reason to be negative?'' -- SM
+
* where do votes happen. This is not formally defined in most bylaws. The real
question is where to vote on people. Jakarta based projects have the tradition to
even perform this type of votes in public, while the very idea of public votes on
people is alien to most people from a http background. Since we want to invite
participation from the whole of the ASF I'd suggest to restrict votes on people, as
far as we actually need any, to the PMC list.
''agreed.'' -- LSD
+
+ ''in case of voting is required, I'm fine with either'' -- SM
== Actual Draft ==
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
