> -----Original Message----- > From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 March 2004 23:03 > To: Gump code and data > Subject: Re: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found! > > Updates made > Vincent Massol wrote: > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Nick Chalko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: 15 March 2004 22:24 > >>To: Gump code and data > >>Subject: Re: [Cactus] Gump build failure: Culprit found! > >> > >>I am preparing to blog this at > >>http://gump.chalko.com/gb/blog/Issues/?smm=y&permalink=Cactus- > >>CommonsHttpclient.txt&preview=true > >> > >>Please take moment and read to make sure I am staying friendly to both > >>projects. > >> > >> > >> > > > >2/ httpclient HEAD (i.e. v3.x) is not going to be backward compatible > >with v2.x and thus several APIs will be broken. The question has been > >asked on Cactus dev mailing list as to whether we stay on the 2.x branch > >or follow 3.x. > > > > > Do you have a link to the actual email thread. I don't see it in the > archive?
Just sent it about 1 hour ago. You should be able to see it in a few hours on http://www.mail-archive.com/cactus-dev%40jakarta.apache.org/maillist.htm l Thread name is: "[VOTE] Following HttpClient 3.x or staying with HttpClient 2.x?" Thanks -Vincent --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
