On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) state loud and clear that the direction is Gumpy and retire > traditional gump, this will help creating itches to scratch
+1 > 2) refactor our CVS module: > > gump-traditional > gump > gump-data Hmm, looks like going a little too far. But if we go that route, we may want to move the code modules to svn. No strong opinion. > 3) stop calling it gumpy but rather start doing version numbering, > so that would be Gump 2.0, when Gump 1.0 was traditional +0.5 I'm not sure that names matter, as long as everybody involved know what is what ... > 4) add a cron job so that [EMAIL PROTECTED] becomes the official gump run. If it works as stable as LSD, +1. Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
