apmail folks, Please add me as a moderator of the following lists:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. -- Martin Cooper On Tue, 23 Mar 2004, Sam Ruby wrote: > Stefan Bodewig wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Gump has been trying to tell you about the build problem for the past > > three weeks, but looking at the list archives, the nag mails have > > never been delivered to the list. > > > > Gump is configured to use Ted Husted's address to send the nag mails > > for any taglib failures. The only reason I can imagine that the mails > > are not going to the list is that Ted is no longer subscribed to the > > list (at least not using the specific address that Gump uses) and the > > moderator didn't moderate the Gump nag mails in. > > taglibs-dev has a backlog of 58 moderation requests pending. > > Ted Husted unsubscribed from taglibs-dev on 31 Mar 2003. > > taglibs-dev has one moderator defined: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > As a temporary fix, I added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the 'allow' list for this > mailing list. > > - Sam Ruby > > > Two questions: > > > > (1) Dear moderator, why didn't you accept/allow the nag messages? Are > > they unwanted by the taglibs community? If so, it would be easier to > > turn nagging off in Gump than to silently discard them. At least the > > Gump community wouldn't think you'd know about any problems. Since > > all taglibs committers (all Apache committers) are Gump committers as > > well, you can easily disable nagging yourself. > > > > (2) If nagging is wanted by the community, should Gump use a different > > sender address than Ted's? Any address would do as long as the mails > > get moderated in. > > > > Cheers > > > > Stefan > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
