Question for a gump newbi.
As the fog clears - you would anticipate a fog factor approaching zero.
Maybe it should, a boundary value is more comparable.
In the context of gump - is zero fog a good thing? Summary - I don't understand the fog factor index - can anyone explain it or point me to relevant documentation?
For today, quite the reverse. The larger the better.
Gump does what Gump does, and some projects support that better than others. FOG is an attempt to translate that into something simple/comparable/tangible so folks can get a quick insight into something's suitability as a Gump dependency for their project. [It doesn't today directly translate to any other project 'quality' metric, but it might one day.]
I had a hunch that this was the case - so current-fog ~= clarity and as such real fog may perhaps be better defined as
real-fog = 1/(current-fog)
If that's is a correct (reasonable) assumption - is this something I should post to JIRA?
Cheers, Stephen.
regards,
Adam
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
|------------------------------------------------| | Magic by Merlin | | Production by Avalon | | | | http://avalon.apache.org/merlin | | http://dpml.net/merlin/distributions/latest | |------------------------------------------------|
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
